« May 2012 | Main

December 2012 Archives

December 23, 2012

Opinion No. 12-03



Opinion No. 12-03

Issued December 13, 2012

1. May a community association management company profit from legal work performed by the company’s in-house attorney?

2. A community association management company’s profiting from legal work performed by the company’s in-house attorney constitutes the improper sharing of fees with a non-lawyer in violation of Utah Rule of Professional Conduct 5.4(a).

3. An attorney is employed as in-house counsel for a community association management company. Although the company does not profit from the legal work the attorney performs, the company believes that other community association management companies routinely profit from the legal work performed by their respective in-house attorneys. Specifically, these companies collect a fee from their clients for legal services at a rate that is higher than the cost the companies incur in employing their corporate attorneys. The issue addressed in this Opinion stems from this practice.

Continue reading "Opinion No. 12-03" »

About December 2012

This page contains all entries posted to Ethics Advisory Opinions in December 2012. They are listed from oldest to newest.

May 2012 is the previous archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

The Utah State Bar presents this web site as a service to our members and to the public. Information presented in this site is NOT legal advice. Please review the Terms of Use for more policy, disclaimer & liability information - ©Utah State Bar email: info@utahbar.org